Sunday Services
"Loving Your Neighbors"
A sermon by the Rev. Judith E. Meyer
Unitarian Universalist Community Church
Santa Monica, California
January 21, 2001
I grew up in one of the older suburbs of northern New Jersey,
where houses were close together.
From my brother’s bedroom window we could look across the driveway
directly into our neighbors' house,
where noisy drunken rampages
provided us children with a sobering message
about alcohol abuse and bad marriages.
As those neighbors grew frail and declined further into infirmity,
my mother was the one to notice
that when things were too quiet next door,
someone was probably in trouble.
More than once she helped one or another of them up off the floor.
I now realize what a generous effort she made.
On the other side,
lived people who for some reason I cannot recall,
were feuding with us.
We didn’t speak.
But at night, over the dinner table,
my mother frequently produced a detailed narrative of everything
that went on over there,
embellishing her observations
with a scathing critique of the way
they raised their children and pets.
I grew up believing that feeding children bologna
was a form of child abuse.
I wouldn't be relating all of this right now –
and probably shouldn't be –
but a recent article by Jeffrey Toobin
in The New Yorker restimulated the memories.
Toobin tells the story of a landlord shooting his tenant.
The tenant was an eccentric
but well loved elementary school teacher
who had lived in the same building
as her landlord for thirty years.
She paid her rent on time,
but she used her "rent checks as a forum
in which to air her complaints," Toobin writes.
"In a careful hand, she nearly covered
the back of each check with accusations."
These ranged from sleep deprivation to vandalism and robbery.
They had little basis in reality,
but she clung to her suspicions for decades.
Finally, the landlord couldn't take these accusations any longer.
He made her an offer:
four months of free rent,
to be followed by the tenant's voluntary departure.
She did not respond.
The eviction proceedings were well under way
when the landlord and tenant came to a showdown.
She waved a hammer at him
and he shot her with his .38.
This tragic outcome should have been avoidable.
There was no basis in the tenant's accusations
against her landlord:
her delusions had taken over her life.
Colleagues tried to convince her to move out,
but she refused,
because she thought that her apartment was
in every other way, ideal.
Locked into a struggle that fed on proximity
and lack of communication,
the neighbors led each other to their demise.
What is it about neighbors?
What accounts for the intensity of our feeling
towards people we barely know?
True, neighbors may know more about you
than some friends do.
There is an intimacy between neighbors,
even when the relationship is bad,
as the New York landlord-tenant feud
so tragically illustrated.
Although they hated each other,
in some perverse way
they were the most significant people
in each other's life.
When neighbors become friends,
the world is friendlier.
There is a sense of safety and warmth
in knowing that the people who live near by
care about you.
Whether neighbors are friendly,
distant,
or at war with each other
affects our lives more deeply
than we realize.
Whatever the condition of the relationship,
we are connected to each other.
The teachings of the Jewish and Christian traditions
aim directly at this connection,
to name it,
sustain it,
and heal it when needed.
In the Hebrew bible, Leviticus,
the book of rituals and laws,
offers this advice:
"You shall not hate your brother in your heart,
but you shall reason with your neighbor,
lest you bear sin because of him.
You shall not take vengeance
or bear any grudge
against the sons of your own people,
but you shall love your neighbor as yourself."
It is clear that "neighbor," in this case,
refers to fellow Israelites only –
your neighbor is one of your own.
You do not take vengeance or bear grudges
against one of your own people.
Jesus critiqued many accepted social norms of his time,
including this one.
In the Sermon on the Mount,
Jesus directly challenged Hebrew law:
"You have heard that it was said,"
he says, referring to Leviticus,
"'You shall love your neighbor
and hate your enemy.'
But I say to you,
Love your enemies
and pray for those who persecute you."
And Jesus even goes so far as to redefine
what a neighbor is.
When one of his followers asks him,
"Who is my neighbor?"
Jesus responds with the story of the Good Samaritan.
In this story, a foreigner shows compassion for a stranger.
Jesus exhorts his followers,
"Go now and do likewise."
The stranger is my neighbor.
With Jesus, the teaching evolved
from loving your neighbor
because you belong to the same tribe,
to loving the stranger and the enemy
as your neighbor too.
It is an idealistic and challenging teaching in any time.
Most of us have enough trouble
simply loving our neighbor,
as Leviticus instructed: with reason and without vengeance.
There's almost no such thing anymore
as belonging to the same tribe,
and the person who lives across the way
is probably as strange as they come.
These days the neighbor might even be
the stranger and the enemy.
Our new neighbors across the way from us
are building a tall fence,
the maximum height allowed in Santa Monica.
In a few more days,
we won't even have to say hello
to each other anymore.
Everyone seems relieved.
A good fence is a tempting solution
to the problem of implementing what Jesus taught:
don't even try anymore.
We still have the sense of connection,
perhaps even have a longing for it,
but have lost the ability to act on it.
Most of us live in neighborhoods
from which we come and go,
without really knowing anyone.
Such teachings as "love your neighbor,"
or "love the stranger and the enemy
as you love your neighbor,"
are difficult to interpret,
as well as act upon.
That's why we were relieved to see the tall fence go up
across the way from our home:
we don't have to figure out what to do.
In the story I told earlier, "Old Joe and the Carpenter,"
two old neighbors, long-time friends,
fall into a petty dispute and become alienated from each other.
It's sad because they're the only friends
they have left –
their wives have died,
and they have grown old.
They don't know how to mend their friendship,
so they give up.
One puts in a creek on the property line
between them.
Not to be outdone, the other proposes a fence.
But along comes a wise young carpenter,
who offers to do the work –
and then, instead of building a fence –
he builds a bridge.
The bridge leads the two old neighbors to reconcile
and they restore their friendship.
That traditional American tale gives a new image
of what it takes to be a good neighbor.
It takes the deliberate building of bridges
to join together what has been disconnected:
a nice metaphor for our times.
We are well beyond the time
when we can follow the advice
to treat our neighbors well
because we are all belong to the same tribe.
That thinking was outdated
even when Jesus began challenging it:
it's not our own people we must love,
as Jesus pointed out,
it's the strange and foreign people,
the ones who are different from us.
We should be like the Good Samaritan.
As biblical scholars always point out,
people shunned and looked down on Samaritans.
Jesus used the example of a Samaritan
to illustrate the need to reach beyond social differences
and sameness,
as the Samaritan himself did.
The chasm is just as wide now as it was then,
perhaps even wider.
We all need bridges to cross over
if we want to be good neighbors to each other.
The bridge is a good image
because it shows us that perhaps
we cannot do it on our own.
Just as the two old neighbors needed a wise carpenter
to build the bridge between them,
we need interventions too.
What sort of intervention the New York tenant and landlord could have used
to settle their dispute before it turned to violence
challenges the imagination,
although mediation and psychological attention might have helped.
The really bad neighbor problems
are intractable and dense:
consider the Israelis and the Palestinians,
or closer to home,
the clashes over gang turf
or ethnic transitions from one block to another.
If people can learn to love their enemies,
they must first cross over their boundaries and meet.
And when we meet, we remember,
just as Old Joe and his friend did,
that we still need each other.
Human beings live in our connection to each other,
and when that connection is broken,
the world becomes a scary place.
What that world asks of us now
is to make the new connections
and build the new bridges
that are needed in these new times:
for we are strangers and neighbors,
still trying to figure out how to love one another.
Sources:
"Shotgun Eviction," by Jeffrey Toobin, The New Yorker, December 11, 2000.
This text is for personal use only, and may not be copied
or distributed without the permission of the author.