Building News Archive

Mar 2004

Statements of Judith Meyer and Barbara Kernochan to the Santa Monica CityPlanning Commission

Judith Meyer:

I am Judith Meyer, minister of the Unitarian Universalist Community Churchof Santa Monica. We are here tonight to present our proposal for improvingour buildings. You will soon hear from Barbara Kernochan, chair of our buildingcommittee, and Ralph Mechur, our architect, about details of the plan. Membersand friends of our church are also hoping to speak at the appropriate time.My role is to introduce you to the history and mission of our faith community.

Our Santa Monica church was founded over 75 years ago, when a small groupof Unitarians began meeting in each other’s living rooms. With helpfrom our Association headquarters in Boston, a minister arrived along withthe funding to build a modest church. Our original building at 18th and Arizona,a mission-style sanctuary, was designed by the Santa Monica architect JohnByers. The sanctuary remains part of our worship space.

Our Unitarian Universalist faith embraces democratic process and respectfor the inherent worth and dignity of every person. We are an intentionallyinclusive and pluralistic community. Our doors are open to all who wish tojoin us regardless of religious background, race, color, sex, sexual orientation,gender identity, or national origin. Our lively congregation now numbers about450 adults and 120 children.

When you enter the front doors of our church, you see the words of our covenant,an historic statement from our faith tradition: “Love is the doctrineof this church. The quest for truth is its sacrament, and service is its prayer.To dwell together in peace; to seek knowledge in freedom; to serve humankindin fellowship; thus do we covenant with each other.”

Over the years, our covenant has guided us in building a community that putsour faith into action. We are especially proud of our history of communityoutreach and involvement. Here are some highlights:

-- Our minister emeritus, the Rev. Ernie Pipes and Rabbi Ernest Block formeda clergy association that later became the Westside Interfaith Council (1955-1960).

-- The congregation collaborated with the Santa Monica AME Church to setup one of the area’s first Head Start programs (1966).

-- Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers Board members used our churchas a primary site for negotiations between the UFW and a major grower (1973).

-- The congregation voted to become a Sanctuary Congregation for refugeesfrom El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua and a dedicated Peace Site (1986).

-- After decades of advocacy for the civil rights of gay, lesbian, bisexualand transgender persons, we formalized our status as a Welcoming Congregation(2003).

Our tradition of community involvement and service continues today with ourFaith in Action program. Our congregation provides hundreds of volunteersto local social service agencies such as the Westside Food Bank, OPCC, andStep Up on Second. We belong to the Westside Shelter and Hunger Coalition.Our Peace Site activities include regular public lectures and forums on currentissues.

In addition to our congregation, our buildings offer a resource for groupsin the local community. Nearly every day of the week we host a twelve-stepmeeting, or a music recital, or a spirituality program sponsored by membersof the larger community. Shared space nurtures cooperative relationships andunderstanding, which we cherish.

The proposed improvements will provide adequate and accessible space forour congregation and for the larger community. Our mission of service andcivic involvement will be well served by our building program. Thank you foryour time and consideration of our proposal.


Barbara Kernochan:

I am Barbara Kernochan, chairperson of the Building Committee which has undertakenthe church's current efforts to enhance our facilities. We began this processseveral years ago as we looked around and realized our buildings were inadequate,both to accommodate our Sunday worshipers and to house our religious educationprogram. We discussed the possibility of moving from our home of 75 yearsin order to meet our facility needs. Instead, we decided we wanted to stayin Santa Monica . Our congregation draws primarily from this community, andit is here that our history lives. Given the very limited square footage ofour two lots on 17th and 18th Streets, we recognize that we can hope onlyto accommodate our current programs and that our membership cannot grow muchbeyond its current size. Our goal therefore, is to make optimal use of thespace at our current location, with the following three priorities:

1. We need to improve accessibility, safety, and circulation throughout ourbuildings.

2. We want to provide appropriate facilities for religious education.

3. And we want to enhance our meeting space in the sanctuary itself.

*Looking first at accessibility and safety issues:

Our buildings are quite old, with numerous obvious shortcomings. There isno elevator to the classrooms now on the second floor of our 18th Street mainbuilding. Circulation, especially in the upstairs rooms, is downright dangerouswith our current floorplan. Only one bathroom is wheelchair accessible inthe whole complex, and there is no access to the chancel for those who usea wheelchair or walker.

We would like to provide accessible bathrooms, an elevator and two liftsin order to address these shortcomings. We plan to replace a rarely used secondstairway on the southside of the fellowship hall with a new stairway on thenorthside. Circulation as well as entry and exiting will be improved, withnew doorways opening to gardens and patio areas and better circulation withinthe sanctuary itself.

With our religious education program housed in a new 17th Street building,we can provide elevator access to all our classrooms. Appropriate space forour religious education program is our second goal. The rooms we currentlyuse for classrooms and meetings are very small, mostly on the second floor,and have only marginal access to the outdoors. What we call our nursery ismakeshift in the extreme. On Sunday mornings, we gate off a portion of ouradministrative office to care for our infants and toddlers. Instead of sinksand changing facilities, our little ones share space with file cabinets andother office furnishings.

We would like to replace our old, cramped classrooms with larger, light-filledrooms. We want our children to have direct access to secure outdoor spaces.And we want better meeting spaces for the adult workshops, committees, andothergroups that use these spaces at other times. We desperately need a dedicatednursery space, with appropriate facilites, sinks and counters, and its ownyard.

*Finally, we look to our sanctuary. With modest growth over the years, wefind ourselves very crowded at Sunday services. Even after moving to two morningservices, we still must provide overflow seating in the fellowship hall, wherethe service can be heard, at least, over the public address system.

We hope to widen the sanctuary to better accommodate our Sunday morning congregants.This will be accomplished not by increasing the building footprint, but byrearranging the interor space in a manner consistent with solving our accessand circulation problems. A larger chancel allows us to place our piano andorgan in a better location and to provide chancel access via a lift on oneside.

As you review our application, please consider the following points:

1. Our building proposal is designed to address our current needs, not toprovide for future growth by increasing our facility usage or programs. Wewant to replace our current classrooms, room for room, and incorporate a modestadditional space into our sanctuary. We do not anticipate that the Westsidewill be overrun by Unitarians.

2. In accordance with the principles of our faith,our congregation participatesin a wide range of activities promoting peace, social justice and environmentalcauses. Collaborating with numerous community agencies, we are anxious tocontinue our work here.

3. We know that Sunday morning services impact neighborhood parking. We provideoff-street parking at this time of high facility usge in order to minimizethis impact, and will continue to do so for the benefit of our neighbors aswell as our members.

4. We have always endeavored to be a good neighbor. At our preliminary meetingwith city planning staff, we were informed that there was not a single complainton record regarding our building or usage. Should there be concerns now, weare ready to work with city staff to find solutions. Thank you for your carefulattention.

Feb 2004

Building Additions, Improvements Estimated at $1.8 Million

The congregation met on Sunday, January 25, to review plans and status ofthe building program. The good news is much progress has been made toward realizinga better and more usable facility for the congregation. Everyone who spoke alsoemphasized there is still much work to be done. The Rev. Judith Meyer said thatthe Building Committee has done tremendous work toward making additions andimprovements a reality.

Carol Kerr, board president, opened the meeting citing three truths: first,the congregation still must approve final plans, budget and process before constructioncan begin; second, design and costs will change, based on changes requestedby the city and by cost considerations identified by the contractor; and third,the true cost of the building program will not be known until the last invoiceis paid, because this is just the nature of construction projects. Current projectestimate is $1.8 million.

Barbara Kernochan, Building Committee Chair, described the process as a smallbuilding project with the complications of a large project, mostly the resultof its urban setting. She said that Wednesday, March 3 is the tentative datefor presenting the project to the Planning Commission and hopes that the congregationand neighbors will come out then to support the project. Barbara said the churchhas received a very supportive letter from UCLA Santa Monica Hospital. She anticipatesa second Planning Commission appearance before the plan can be approved.

Barbara said there is much planning still to do, including determining whetherto overlap construction of the 17th Street building with additions and changesto the church and Forbes Hall, which may shorten construction time but wouldimpose other logistics issues.

Architect Ralph Mechur presented plans and drawings describing the interactionthat must take place with the city and then with the contractor before constructioncan begin. If every step goes perfectly, construction might start this summerand would take between 10 and 14 months to complete.

—Nels Hanson

Jan 2004

Next Stop for Our Building is the City of Santa Monica

Many of you may have seen recent articles in the local Santa Monica papersabout complaints from local businesses about the slowness of the Santa Monicaplanning department. Well, that’s what we are waiting for and waitingand waiting.But we are making progress and have been told by the planners that we will “probably”get to the planning commission the end of January. The architectural reviewboard will follow.

The planning department continues to find issues we must address as we goalong, the latest being some changes they want in order to preserve the “historic”south façade facing 18th Street. We are continuing to work with the contractorto refine the cost estimates, which is hard to do at such an early stage ofdevelopment of the drawings. But soon we hope to be able to report back to thecongregation some more updated cost information. Ultimately, we will not knowthe exact cost until the final bids are in after completion of the working drawings,which will begin after the project is approved by the planning commission.

We are also starting to plan our presentation to the planning commission.We will let everyone know when that will take place, as we will need to havea good turnout of supporters. Come to the January 25 TownHall meeting for a complete update.

— Barbara Kernochan

Nov 2003

Santa Monica Planning Commission is Working on Our Building Proposal

There is still no date on our signboards, but city planner Laura Beck has deemedour application for a conditional use permit and parking variance complete.She tells us to expect our hearing before the Planning Commission by early February.

Questions remain, of course. One example: our 18th Street property appearsmust be reviewed and approved by the city’s historic consultant. We aremeanwhile considering various landscape and hardscape ideas, with the guidanceof Fran Hotchkiss.

We remain very pleased with the work of our architect, Ralph Mechur. He isconversant with the sometimes arcane workings of the city approval process andis a familiar face to many at the city offices. He continues to give generouslyof his time, meeting with the Building Committee and various subsets as needed.

The recent bequest to the church comes at a most opportune time. Althoughone million dollars has been pledged by our members toward the building program,this princely sum would suffice to build only one building, not both. Thanksto the extraordinary generosity of Earl Morgan, completion of the full buildingprogram is once again a realizable goal. With a still considerable gap of about$300,000 remaining, we must continue working to bring in additional contributionsand perhaps finance a small amount.

The congregation has taken on an ambitious program of facility enlargementand improvement in order to keep our church
home healthy and strong. As prospects for city action and full funding approach,our work is becoming more exciting by the day.

-- Barbara Kernochan, for the Building Committee

Sep 2003

We Get the City’s First Green Light to Start Our Building/Remodeling

Have you noticed the large signboards in front of the sanctuary and facing17th Street? They represent a giant step forward in our building process. Wehave officially submitted our building proposal to the Santa Monica city planners,applying for a conditional use permit and parking variance, and those signsindicate that the city process has begun.

As is customary, alas, our application was deemed incomplete. The city hasposed additional questions about very specific architectural details and eventhe types of trees we anticipate planting, and our architect and others havebeen busy responding to those remaining queries.

Once our revised application has been deemed complete, the city will giveus a date for our hearing. You will know this step has been taken when a dateappears on those big signs.

Meanwhile, we have requested an itemized breakdown of costs from our selectedconstruction company.

Our next decision points will focus as much on our financial picture and thewill of the congregation as on the city’s approval process. Stay tuned.

Barbara Kernochan for the Building Committee

Jul 2003

Suppose We Gave a Party...and Nobody Came?

The building process has reached the point where we have invited the neighborsin to explain our plans and to deal with any objections. We mailed out morethan 300 invitations to the surrounding neighbors and invited them to the churchSunday afternoon, June 8, for a presentation and Q&A session. We displayeddrawings, illustrations and models of the new building. We prepared refreshments.The architect and the building committee were present, ready and eager to resondto any questions or objections.

No neighbors showe up: zero, nil, nada, zilch.

Paradoxically, we are satisfied with the results: it means that the projectis progressing. It means that currently there is no active opposition. It meansthat we can demonstrate that to the city. It means we got to eat all of thebrownies.

-- Len Adler, for the Building Committee

Jun 2003

Plans, City Approval, and Costs are on Building Committee Agenda

May was a slow month for the building committee. We met only once, while ourarchitect, Ralph Mechur, reworked his drawings to incorporate the congregation’spreferences elicited at the March 23 meeting, and our attorney worked to completethe “findings” to submit to the city. Ralph is also waiting forappointments with the city planners. This month we will have a reception tointroduce the project to our nearby neighbors.

Our new design utilizes the existing building at the back of our 17th Streetproperty, adding a new classroom/meeting room building, a bridge connectionto the renovated existing building, an elevator, and bathrooms. The plan leavesconsiderable outdoor space along the south side of the new building and in aplaza between the buildings. The sanctuary plans remain essentially the same,widening the sanctuary into existing office space, with offices moving upstairs.

We want to reconfigure the Forbes Hall building somewhat, shifting one staircaseto the north end and opening part of the south end for storage. The new planmeets our congregation-identified need for a large gathering space (the expandedsanctuary), accessibility in both buildings, a dedicated nursery, and larger,more flexible classroom and meeting spaces. The congregation’s responseto this new design direction has been very positive.

Financially, the project remains uncertain. As we work closely with an estimatorand/or contractor in the coming months, we will explore ways to address theneed for funding additional to the one million pledged thus far if we wish tocomplete the entire building program. Steering the project through the cityprocess and informing the congregation’s financial decisions will be thefocus of the coming year’s work.

--Barbara Kernochan

May 2003

Architect Answers Congregation's Questions

A congregational gathering held March 23, after the second service, reinforcedboth the need for building enhancements and the support of the congregationfor the design direction we are pursuing. The opening salvos of the war in Iraqunderscored for many of us the importance of a physical space to serve our membershipand the larger community through outreach, essential dialogues, and the worshipthat takes place in our church home. Our building program will contribute toa brighter future for liberal religious thought and activity on the West Side.

We have been listening to the ideas and advice of many individuals, includingJay Gobus, Kris Langabeer, Kathy Cook, Julie Hill, Warren Mathews, and FranHotchkiss in order to help our new architect design to our needs. We have alsogathered recommendations from subcommittees and task forces on kitchen facilities,possible Forbes Hall improvements, technical subsystems and maybe even a labyrinthor meditation maze on 17th Street. We've received comments on a possible newchancel design and choir placement as well. Thanks to all who are helping moveour design process forward and to those who offered their comments at Sunday'smeeting.

Our architect, Ralph Mechur, walked us through his design, including a refinementof his original concept for 17th Street and some changes to the main building.New costs could be added for some very desirable improvements to Forbes Hallthat were not included in his first conceptual design. We are awaiting solidline-item cost estimates for this new design work. Meanwhile, we are at thepoint of submitting our application package to the city planning office. Ourproposal will include our full wish list as shown on current plans, even thoughwe are uncertain whether we can achieve all of our goals with our current financialpicture. The city process is a lengthy one, but we hope to return to the congregationin the coming months for a vote on our next steps.

Ralph elaborated on his latest design work. His most recent schematic drawings,as well as his biographical information, are on display on the kiosk in ForbesHall. We hope everyone will take a look at these recent developments. The buildingcommittee stands committed to this project under the wise guidance of our architect,and wants to express thanks to all who helped us with their questions and comments.

Excitement is, indeed, building.

-- Barbara Kernochan
for the Building Committee

Apr 2003

Architect Busy Preparing Drawings

This past month, the building committee has been meeting almost every weekto review the plans being drafted by architect Ralph Mechur. Here are some ofthe plas that were presented to the congregation:

After a trial run of placing the choir on the level of the floor, the congregationwas surveyed for feedback on the sound and aesthetics of the location. The vastmajority of respondents found the music to be somewhat better or no different.Only a few thought it was negatively impacted. The replies on the aestheticswere hard to judge because at the last minute the piano had to be moved in frontof the choir so the pianist could see the choir director. (The results of thesurvey are posted on the building kiosk in Forbes Hall.) The new plans havethe choir director standing on the chancel while the choir seats are at floorlevel.

At the back of the chancel is a small room that will house the controls forthe microphones and other sound equipment. The organ and piano will be on thechancel, off to one side. The current configuration has a mix of pews and chairs,with the sanctuary seating 213.

The big change in the Forbes Hall building is the moving of the stairway fromthe front to the back. This will comply with fire codes, and give us additionalstorage areas upstairs and downstairs. The administrative offices will be onthe second floor.

The existing building across the alley will be connected to the new buidling.The area between has been designed with a dramatic stairway encircling an outdoorpatio. The solid back of the stairway created a dark area in the hallways belowand behind it, so the back was changed to a lattice design. The stairway takesup a lot of room, but the fire code does not allow it to be placed in a lessconspicuous location. The possibility of creating a permanent laybrinth in thearea between the buildings is being studied. The 17th Street property will haveseven classrooms in the two buildings, plus a spacious nursery. There is alsoa space for a teachers' room.

While Ralph is working on the plans to present to the city, Barbara Kernochanis revising Judith Meyer's "case statement" to reflect these new plans.This describes who we are: our mission, history in the community, a descriptionof the project, and our reasons for undertaking it.

About a month ago, Ralph met with the city and was told our parking requirementis spaces for six cars. This is based on our increased needs due to the addedsanctuary space. The parking does not have to be on site, so the committee isexploring nearby neighborhood locations we might be able to use.

Mar 2003

Town Hall Meeting Planned

On Sunday, March 23, after the second service, there will be a presentationof the work done to date by our architect, Ralph Mechur. Fromthe time he took over the project until the end of January, all his attentionwas focused on the 17th Street property and working with the city. In February,he turned his attention to the sanctuary building and Forbes Hall. At our Marchtown hall meeting, Ralph will present his ideas to the congregation and memberswill have an opportunity to ask questions and make suggestions.

In addition to Ralph's plans, there are also some very preliminary plans drawnby our member, Fran Hotchkiss, who is a landscape designer.The focus of the design is the courtyard between the existing building on 17thStreet and the new building. After the presentation to the congregation, wewill consider plans for making a presentation to our neighbors.

Finances are an important element in the building equation. The capital campaignwe had last year went pretty well and we appreciate so many members and friendssupporting the program. We do still have additional funds to raise if we areto successfully complete the full scope of the building program. On March 23,Jim Cadwell, the chair of the capital campaign committee, willgive a brief update of the status of the campaign.